Opinion
83373
08-18-2021
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original, emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order appointing a receiver.
An appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004); see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Since an order appointing a receiver is appealable under NRAF* 3A(b)(4). petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the district court s order. See NRAP 4(a)(1) (stating that the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when written notice of entry of the order appealed from is served). Thus, we decline to consider this petition for extraordinary writ relief, NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court. 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991), and we
In light of this order, petitioners' emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.
Parraguirre, J., Stiglich, J., Silver, J.
Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge