From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 27, 1977
549 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1977)

Opinion

No. 74-2116.

January 24, 1977. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 27, 1977.

Lee G. Paul (argued), of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Brian K. Landsberg (argued), Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Fred OKrand (argued), ACLU Foundation, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER ON REMAND


The court concludes that all determinations as to modifications required under Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 96 S.Ct. 2697, 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976) of the district court's decrees of 1970 and 1974, should initially be made by the district court. In doing so, it will conclude that some superseding judgment or decree is needed to be entered and to be preceded by current findings of fact.

It seems clear that a bald unqualified order that there shall never be any "majority of any minority" in any Pasadena attendance zone cannot stand.

The resolution of such questions as are mentioned in Part III of the majority opinion by the Supreme Court will necessarily depend on the existing record as it will be supplemented by a subsequent hearing or hearings.

Further than as above indicated, we do not go.


Summaries of

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 27, 1977
549 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1977)
Case details for

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:NANCY ANNE SPANGLER, BY HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, JAMES E. SPANGLER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 27, 1977

Citations

549 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1977)

Citing Cases

Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ.

Pasadena City Bd. of Educ. v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 96 S.Ct. 2697, 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976). After a remand to…

Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ.

The Board is the named appellant in Nos. 77-2902 and 77-2941; certain individual Board members appeal in No.…