From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 2, 1988
520 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-2321.

March 2, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Anne Owens, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We find that the charge of violation of condition three of appellant's probation was withdrawn herein and remand for correction of the order revoking probation to delete reference to that violation. Because the order on costs is ambiguous, as admitted by appellee, we also remand for redetermination of costs. Additionally, because there was no opportunity to object to the restitution requirement, which was not mentioned at sentencing but imposed in the written judgment and sentence, the restitution imposition is set aside. Otherwise affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 2, 1988
520 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Spangel v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD JOSEPH SPANGEL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 2, 1988

Citations

520 So. 2d 703 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)