From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spadaro v. Balesteri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 24, 1997.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Salvatore Balesteri appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated March 28, 1996, as granted the Plaintiffs' motion pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-a and directed the production of recorded statements made by him during the course of an internal investigation conducted by the defendant City of New York Police Department.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Plaintiff's submitted a supplemental record which contained a transcript of the recorded statements made by the defendant during the Police Department's internal investigation. The transcript was reviewed by this Court in camera. We find that the Supreme Court properly directed the production of the recorded statements at issue, as these statements were relevant and material to the action before it ( see, Civil Rights Law § 50-a, [3]; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543; Becker v City of New York, 162 AD2d 488; Lawrence v City of New York, 118 AD2d 758).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Spadaro v. Balesteri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Spadaro v. Balesteri

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SPADARO et al., Respondents, v. SALVATORE BALESTERI, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Calhoun v. Cnty. of Suffolk

Accordingly, the plaintiff met his burden for compelling disclosure pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-a, and…

Blanco v. County of Suffolk

The Supreme Court also improperly denied that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to compel the…