From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sozanski v. Clemmensen

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 15, 2012
NO. 09-12-00467-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00467-CV

11-15-2012

TERRY SOZANSKI, TRUSTEE, Appellant v. ERNEST ROGER CLEMMENSEN, HIGHLAND CAPITAL LENDING, INC. AND ALL OTHER PARTIES SHARING IN THE INTEREST OF HIGHLAND CAPITAL LENDING, INC., Appellees


On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-01-00205-CV


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed the judgment on June 1, 2012, and the appellate timetables were not extended by the filing of a post-judgment motion within thirty days of judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on July 2, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed notice of appeal on September 28, 2012, more than thirty days from the date of judgment and outside the time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect a regular appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. On October 11, 2012, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant amended his notice of appeal to show that he was pursuing a restricted appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 30. No response has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Sozanski v. Clemmensen

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 15, 2012
NO. 09-12-00467-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Sozanski v. Clemmensen

Case Details

Full title:TERRY SOZANSKI, TRUSTEE, Appellant v. ERNEST ROGER CLEMMENSEN, HIGHLAND…

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-12-00467-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)