From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sowada v. Luberts

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 16, 2011
Civil File No. 09-3320 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil File No. 09-3320 (MJD/LIB).

May 16, 2011


ORDER


The above-entitled matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated March 18, 2011. [Docket No. 49]. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including all transcripts filed and exhibits submitted to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as clarified below.

Initially, the Court notes that on line 5 of page 11 of the Report and Recommendation the hourly rate should read $150.00 per hour, as opposed to, 4150.00 per hour. Additionally, on page 11 of the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that each Defendant be awarded $1,050 to cover attorney's fees and costs associated with bringing the respective motions to enforce the settlement agreement. In this case, there are four defendants, however, Defendants Kaj Meinhardt and the State of Minnesota (the "State Defendants") were represented by the same counsel, and Defendants Jamie Luberts and Morrison County (the "County Defendants") were represented by the same counsel. Rather than award attorneys' fees and costs to each Defendant, the Court finds it appropriate to award these fees and costs in the amount of $1,050 to the State Defendants and $1,050 to the County Defendants. If the Court were to award each Defendant $1,050, the result would be duplicative, because the attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Defendants Meinhardt and the State of Minnesota are in fact the same, as are the fees and costs incurred by Defendants Luberts and Morrison County. Accordingly, the Court will award fees and costs in the amount of $1,050 to the State Defendants and, $1,050 to the County Defendants.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 28, 2011 [Docket No 49] as clarified above.
2. State Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 33] is GRANTED.
3. County Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 39] is GRANTED.
4. Defendants' Request for Sanctions is GRANTED IN PART in that the State Defendants and the County Defendants are each awarded $1,050 for attorneys' fees and costs associated with bringing their respective motions.


Summaries of

Sowada v. Luberts

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 16, 2011
Civil File No. 09-3320 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Sowada v. Luberts

Case Details

Full title:Norris E. Sowada Irene Sowada, Plaintiffs, v. Jamie Luberts, Morrison…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

Civil File No. 09-3320 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. May. 16, 2011)

Citing Cases

N.B. v. Norwood

Case after case has recognized that the amount of attorney's fees is indeed a material term of an agreement…