From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 8, 1957
2 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1957)

Summary

upholding contractual provision providing for reasonable contractual limitation of period to bring lawsuit

Summary of this case from Imaging Int'l v. Hell Graphic Sys., Inc.

Opinion

Argued January 14, 1957

Decided March 8, 1957

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FRANCIS E. RIVERS, J.

Nelson Rosenbaum for appellant.

Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel ( Anthony Curreri and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ. Taking no part: BURKE, J.


Summaries of

Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 8, 1957
2 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1957)

upholding contractual provision providing for reasonable contractual limitation of period to bring lawsuit

Summary of this case from Imaging Int'l v. Hell Graphic Sys., Inc.
Case details for

Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SOVIERO BROS. CONTRACTING CORP., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 8, 1957

Citations

2 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1957)
161 N.Y.S.2d 888
141 N.E.2d 918

Citing Cases

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortg. Capital Holdings LLC (In re Part 60 Put-Back Litig.)

" ‘A total immunity clause is bad; a limitation provision, if reasonable, is not. In truth, the rule rests…

Part 60 Put-Back Litig. v. Morgan Stanley Mortg. Capital Holdings

" 'A total immunity clause is bad; a limitation provision, if reasonable, is not. In truth, the rule rests…