From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sovereign Bank v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 5, 2013
Civil Action No 13-cv-00230-RBJ (D. Colo. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No 13-cv-00230-RBJ

03-05-2013

SOVEREIGN BANK, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP A. WOLF, Defendant.


Honorable R. Brooke Jackson


ORDER

On February 19, 2013 the Court issued an order sua sponte remanding this case to state court. The defendant has now filed a motion for reconsideration in which he states that the Court is biased against pro se litigants. I do not recall having dealt with Mr. Wolf concerning a complaint he had about other judges in Gilpin County, but I accept his word that I did. I absolutely dispute the accuracy of the "facts" on which he bases his claim of bias. Nevertheless, a judge is generally required to assume the truth of facts asserted in a disqualification motion, even if the judge knows that they are not true. On that basis I will disqualify myself in this instance. The case will be reassigned according the standard procedures of this district.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sovereign Bank v. Wolf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 5, 2013
Civil Action No 13-cv-00230-RBJ (D. Colo. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Sovereign Bank v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:SOVEREIGN BANK, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP A. WOLF, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No 13-cv-00230-RBJ (D. Colo. Mar. 5, 2013)