Opinion
Page 655c
102 Cal.App.4th 655c ___Cal.Rptr.2d___ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent. [And four other cases. ] B155748 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Seventh Division September 30, 2002[Modification of opinion (101 Cal.App.4th 982; 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 211) on denial of petition for rehearing.]
OPINION
THE COURT.
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 4, 2002, and certified for publication, be modified as follows:
On page 2 [101 Cal.App.4th 984, advance report, Counsel, 3d par.], "Dan Wood" should read "Dan Woods";
On page 6, in the second full paragraph [101 Cal.App.4th 987, advance report, 2d par., line 4 (correction made in adv. rep. opn.)] "Independent Service Operator" should be "Independent System Operator";
On page 8, footnote 11 [101 Cal.App.4th 989, advance report, fn. 11 (correction made in adv. rep. opn.)], the word "discreet" should be "discrete";
On page 10, in footnote 15 [101 Cal.App.4th 991, advance report, fn. 15 (correction made in adv. rep. opn.)], the word "pick" should be "neck";
On page 18, on the fourth line of the first full paragraph [101 Cal.App.4th 997, advance report, 1st par., line 1], the year "2001" should be "2000";
On page 19, in the second full paragraph [101 Cal.App.4th 998, advance report, 1st par., line 1 (correction made in adv. rep. opn.)], the phrase "Congress rationale" should read "Congress's rationale."
Petitions for rehearing by Southern California Edison Company, California Cogeneration Council and Central Hydroelectric Corporation are denied.
‡ Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.