From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southerland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 11, 2009
23 So. 3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5D09-332.

December 11, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Brian D. Lambert, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order revoking Southerland's probation. The trial court had the inherent authority to vacate its prior order which was entered without notice to the State. See State v. Burton, 314 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1975) (trial court had inherent authority to vacate order which was product of fraud, collusion, deceit, or mistake); State v. Brooks, 161 Ariz. 177, 777 P.2d 675 (1989) (trial court had inherent authority to vacate order purporting to terminate probation where order was entered as result of mistake or inadvertence). Furthermore, we see no reason why the trial court could not, as it did in this case, timely correct its acknowledged error where this court could have subsequently done so pursuant to a writ of certiorari. See, e.g., Rho-Sigma, Inc. v. Int'l Control and Measurements, Corp., 691 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (trial court departed from essential requirements of law where it entered discovery order without notice to aggrieved party).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Southerland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 11, 2009
23 So. 3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Southerland v. State

Case Details

Full title:Amanda Lynn SOUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 11, 2009

Citations

23 So. 3d 848 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)