Southerland v. Oxford Group

3 Citing cases

  1. Trammel v. Bryant

    580 S.E.2d 661 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003)

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 ( 290 S.E.2d 556) (1982). Therefore, to the extent that Trammel's contentions require a consideration of evidence, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

  2. Prada v. Administrator, Small Business Admin

    432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 5 times

    "However, no transcript of the proceeding is present in the record before us. `Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 ( 290 S.E.2d 556) (1982). See also P. H. L. Dev. Corp. v. Smith, 174 Ga. App. 328 ( 329 S.E.2d 545) (1985).

  3. P. H. L. Development Corp. v. Smith

    174 Ga. App. 328 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that implicit in the trial court's ruling was " finding of a meritorious reason, the promotion of justice, for exercising its inherent power to set aside the default judgment"

    Since no transcript of evidence has been or can be filed since the hearing was not reported, we must affirm all enumerations requiring consideration of evidence. Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 ( 290 S.E.2d 556) (1982). 3. The trial court dismissed appellant's lawsuit due to the pendency of an identical action filed earlier by appellant in another court.