From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southack v. Gleason

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1906
49 Misc. 445 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

February, 1906.

Robertson, Harmon Davies, for appellants.

Cheevey Rogers (Hubert E. Rogers of counsel), for respondent.


The court had power to so amend the proceedings as to turn the action into one against the defendants individually. Boyd v. United States Mortgage Trust Co., 84 A.D. 466. The summons, however, should have been amended, as well as the complaint; and an amendment of the latter, alone, is ineffectual and cannot be sustained.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to make such motion in the court below as he may be advised.

Present: SCOTT, GIEGERICH and GREENBAUM, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to make such motion in court below as he may be advised.


Summaries of

Southack v. Gleason

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1906
49 Misc. 445 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Southack v. Gleason

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE SOUTHACK, Respondent, v . OLIN F. GLEASON et al. as Trustees, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1906

Citations

49 Misc. 445 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)