Summary
holding former owners of property not proper parties to foreclosure suit where they had transferred their rights and interest in the property to a third party and plaintiff was seeking only to foreclose the mortgage, not a deficiency judgment
Summary of this case from Benkovitch v. U.S. BankOpinion
No. 4D00-3958.
Opinion filed May 23, 2001. Rehearing Denied July 12, 2001.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-8594 AW.
Affirmed.
Christian N. Scholin of Mollica Scholin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Edward A. Marod of Edward A. Marod, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Regatta Trading Limited.
Appellee brought a foreclosure action against the owner of the property in question. Appellants, who had previously conveyed all their rights and interests in the property to the owner, filed an emergency motion to intervene. The court denied the motion, and appellants filed this appeal. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion. Appellee was seeking only to foreclose the mortgage, not a deficiency judgment. Having no rights nor interest in the property, appellants were not proper parties to this foreclosure suit. See Mitchell v. Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, 763 So.2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Dennis v. Ivey, 134 Fla. 181, 185, 183 So. 624, 626 (1938)).
Polen, Gross and Taylor, JJ., Concur.