South Carolina Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Marlena A.

Full title: South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Marlena A.…

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Case # 2011-DR-23-1696 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case # 2011-DR-23-1696 Appellate Case No. 2011-199331 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-358

06-13-2012

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Marlena A., Jermaine P., Defendants, In the interest of a minor under the age of 18. South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Marlena A., Kevin B., Defendants, Of whom Marlena A. is the Appellant. In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Alex Kornfeld, of Greenville, for Appellant. Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent. Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Greenville County

Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Alex Kornfeld, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM : Marlena A. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 & Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.