From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Souliotes v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
Case No. 1:06-CV-00667-OWW-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-CV-00667-OWW-MJS (HC)

01-09-2012

GEORGE A. SOULIOTES, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, et al., Respondents.

JIMMY S. MCBIRNEY (STATE BAR NO. 259830) MEGAN CRANE (STATE BAR NO. 269321) SHANNON LEONG (STATE BAR NO. 268612) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building THOMAS S. MCCONVILLE (STATE BAR NO. 155905) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP LINDA STARR (STATE BAR NO. 118789) CHARLES PRESS (STATE BAR NO. 164190) MAITREYA BADAMI (STATE BAR NO. 173241) NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROJECT at SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Attorneys for Petitioner GEORGE A. SOULIOTES


JIMMY S. MCBIRNEY (STATE BAR NO. 259830)

MEGAN CRANE (STATE BAR NO. 269321)

SHANNON LEONG (STATE BAR NO. 268612)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

The Orrick Building

THOMAS S. MCCONVILLE (STATE BAR NO. 155905)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

LINDA STARR (STATE BAR NO. 118789)

CHARLES PRESS (STATE BAR NO. 164190)

MAITREYA BADAMI (STATE BAR NO. 173241)

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROJECT at

SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Attorneys for Petitioner

GEORGE A. SOULIOTES

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING UNDISPUTED FACTS

WHEREAS, on January 4, 2011, the parties filed a Joint Pretrial Statement containing a statement of undisputed facts agreed to by the parties;

WHEREAS, on January 6, 2011, the parties attended a pretrial conference with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Seng in chambers, at which Judge Seng expressed a desire to ensure that the record contain sufficient evidence of each undisputed fact to satisfy a reviewing court;

WHEREAS, the parties seek to satisfy the Court's concern while minimizing the length of the hearing and number of witnesses, avoiding unnecessary or duplicative evidence, and limiting the scope of the hearing to matters genuinely in dispute;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate that:

The record in this case, including the expert reports filed with the Court and the deposition transcripts designated by the parties, contains sufficient evidence to support the sixteen undisputed facts listed in the "Undisputed Facts" section of the Joint Pretrial Statement submitted on Jan. 4, 2012, Docket Number 108. These facts should therefore be accepted as true, and the parties need not present additional evidence or testimony in support of them at the evidentiary hearing scheduled to begin on January 24, 2012.

SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INNOCENCE PROJECT

By: _______________

JIMMY S. MCBIRNEY

Attorneys for Petitioner George A. Souliotes

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

By: _______________

KATHLEEN A. MCKENNA

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Respondent

ORDER

Reserving to itself the ultimate issues of admissibility and weight to be given to the evidence, the Court approves the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Souliotes v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
Case No. 1:06-CV-00667-OWW-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Souliotes v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. SOULIOTES, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Salinas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:06-CV-00667-OWW-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)