From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soukas v. Thomas

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 12, 2009
Civil No. 08-867-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-867-TC.

May 12, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 10, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. Petitioner's petition (#2) is denied, on the merits, with prejudice. This proceeding is dismissed.


Summaries of

Soukas v. Thomas

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 12, 2009
Civil No. 08-867-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Soukas v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:EVANGELOS D. SOUKAS, Petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-867-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Arthur v. Moorehead

Id. Thus, Pearlman does not apply to Mr. Arthur's case and Florida lost primary jurisdiction over Mr. Arthur…