From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sotomayor v. N.Y.C. Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1999
265 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 26, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.).


The jury verdict, finding, inter alia, that defendant had notice of the ice hazard on its premises upon which plaintiff slipped and fell, was supported by legally sufficient evidence, particularly, when the evidence is viewed, as it must be, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the prevailing party at trial (see,Alexander v. Eldred, 63 N.Y.2d 460, 464). Upon review of the record, we find, in addition, that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 45 N.Y.2d 493, 498-499).

SULLIVAN, J.P., TOM, RUBIN, SAXE, BUCKLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Sotomayor v. N.Y.C. Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 1999
265 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Sotomayor v. N.Y.C. Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SOTOMAYOR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 817