From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Zhov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2011
No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P

08-11-2011

WILLIAM SOTO, Plaintiff, v. DR. ZHOV, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case. Plaintiff is informed that he may conduct defendants' depositions by written questions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 4, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Soto v. Zhov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2011
No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Soto v. Zhov

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SOTO, Plaintiff, v. DR. ZHOV, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)