From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SOTO v. ZHOV

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 12, 2011
No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P.

August 12, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case. Plaintiff is informed that he may conduct defendants' depositions by written questions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 31.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 4, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: August 11, 2011.


Summaries of

SOTO v. ZHOV

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 12, 2011
No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)
Case details for

SOTO v. ZHOV

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SOTO, Plaintiff, v. DR. ZHOV, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1842 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)