From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Village of Milan Police Department

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jun 4, 2010
NO. CIV 10-0043 CG/ACT (D.N.M. Jun. 4, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV 10-0043 CG/ACT.

June 4, 2010

FRENCH ASSOCIATES, P.C., Robert W. Becker, Attorneys for Defendants Village of Milan, Police Department and Lee Eaton, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

MASON ISAACSON, P.A., Thomas Lynn Isaacson, Attorneys for Defendants City of Grants Police Department, Jason Fank and Jessie Nieto, Gallup, NM.

MONTOYA LAW, INC., Dennis Montoya, Attorney for Plaintiff, Rio Rancho, NM.


ORDER GRANTING THIRTY (30) DAY EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE MOVE AS TO THE COMPLAINT


THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Motion of the Defendants Village of Milan Police Department, Lee Eaton, City of Grants Police Department, Jason Fank and Jessie Nieto for a thirty (30) day extension of time within which to answer or otherwise move as to the Complaint (Doc. 13). The Court has reviewed the Motion and finds that it is well taken. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants are granted a thirty (30) day extension of time within which to answer or otherwise move as to the Complaint.
2. The extension of time will run from June 3, 2010.
3. Defendants' answer or motion as to the Complaint, must, therefore, be filed and served on or before Tuesday, July 6, 2010.


Summaries of

Soto v. Village of Milan Police Department

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jun 4, 2010
NO. CIV 10-0043 CG/ACT (D.N.M. Jun. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Soto v. Village of Milan Police Department

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL SOTO, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF MILAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV 10-0043 CG/ACT (D.N.M. Jun. 4, 2010)