From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Tx. State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Aug 21, 2008
No. 13-08-00126-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00126-CV

Opinion delivered and filed August 21, 2008.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, David Soto, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. CL-06-2160-B. Upon review of the documents before the Court, the notice of appeal is not in compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b), (c).


Summaries of

Soto v. Tx. State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Aug 21, 2008
No. 13-08-00126-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Soto v. Tx. State Bank

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SOTO, APPELLANT, v. TEXAS STATE BANK, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Aug 21, 2008

Citations

No. 13-08-00126-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 21, 2008)