From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 30, 2010
5:10-cv-00212-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2010)

Opinion

5:10-cv-00212-JMM-JTK.

November 30, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants (Doc. No. 41). In support, Plaintiff states Defendants have not filed an Answer to his Complaint, which was served on August 19, 2010. In their Response, Defendants state they timely filed an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint on August 27, 2010 (Doc. No. 27), and will forward to Plaintiff an additional copy for his records. In light of the above, the Court finds Plaintiff's Motion should be denied. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 41) is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Soto v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Nov 30, 2010
5:10-cv-00212-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Soto v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SOTO, ADC #128324 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2010

Citations

5:10-cv-00212-JMM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2010)