From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Gaudette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Aug 22, 2017
No. 3:10-cv-106 (WWE) (D. Conn. Aug. 22, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-106 (WWE)

08-22-2017

ORLANDO SOTO, CONSERVATOR of the ESTATE OF ISRAEL SOTO, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH L. GAUDETTE, MARTIN HEANUE, DAMIAN CSECH, CHRIS ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER STEPNIEWSKI, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, Defendants.


RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff Orlando Soto, conservator of the estate of Israel Soto, has alleged several civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Bridgeport, Chief of Police Joseph L. Gaudette, Officer Martin Heanue, Officer Damien Csech, Officer Chris Robinson, and Sergeant Christopher Stepniewski.

In a ruling dated October 22, 2015, this Court granted summary judgment, inter alia, on the claims against Sergeant Stepniewski based on his alleged beating of plaintiff after the tasing incidents. Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of this portion of the summary judgment ruling. Upon review, the Court will grant the motion for reconsideration.

The Second Circuit recently reviewed this Court's ruling and found that it had no basis for appellate jurisdiction due to disputed issues of fact with the exception of the ruling on summary judgment as to defendant Csech. --------

Plaintiff asserts that Sergeant Stepniewski beat plaintiff with blows to the head while he was unresponsive and face down. Defendants argued that plaintiff cannot offer any evidence of this alleged beating because there is no testimony, no police report, no witness reports or other circumstantial evidence that would raise an inference that such event occurred. Plaintiff had supported his claim with an unverified letter from a medical expert. The Court held that a reasonable jury's consideration of these claims against defendant Stepniewski would necessitate speculation. However, plaintiff has now filed a sworn affidavit from the medical expert, Dr. Adam Mednick, a neurologist. Plaintiff has also pointed out instances where the circumstantial evidence may support his claims against defendant Stepniewski based on the alleged battery.

The Court GRANTS the motion for reconsideration [doc. #144] and VACATES its prior ruling on the claims at issue against Sergenat Stepniewski. Plaintiff's claims of excessive force and assault and battery alleged against Sergeant Stepniewski may proceed to a jury.

Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 22d day of August, 2017.

/s/Warren W. Eginton

WARREN W. EGINTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Soto v. Gaudette

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Aug 22, 2017
No. 3:10-cv-106 (WWE) (D. Conn. Aug. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Soto v. Gaudette

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO SOTO, CONSERVATOR of the ESTATE OF ISRAEL SOTO, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Aug 22, 2017

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-106 (WWE) (D. Conn. Aug. 22, 2017)

Citing Cases

Jennings v. City of Bridgeport

See Soto, 2015 WL 6453083, rev'd in part, appeal dismissed in part sub nom. Soto v. Gaudett, 862 F.3d 148 (2d…