From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Cruz

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 29, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 80942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05583 Docket No. V-16989-08 V-16989-08/10A V-23996-08 V-23997-08 M159928

07-29-2013

In the Matter of Marisol Soto, respondent, v. Jamie Cruz, appellant.


SCHEDULING ORDER

Appeal by Jamie Cruz from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated May 1, 2013. By order on certification of this Court dated June 5, 2013, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:

Mark W. Brandys, Esq.
225 Broadway, Suite 1800
New York, N.Y. 10007
646-266-2493
By letter dated July 23, 2013, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is

ORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,

ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this Court dated June 5, 2013, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.


Summaries of

Soto v. Cruz

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Jul 29, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 80942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Soto v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marisol Soto, respondent, v. Jamie Cruz, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 29, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 80942 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)