Soto v. Bridgers

1 Citing case

  1. O'Kon & Co. v. Tishman Speyer Atlanta Associates

    307 S.E.2d 282 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

    See Barnes v. Reliable Tractor Co., 117 Ga. App. 777 ( 161 S.E.2d 918). Nevertheless, a jury might find that appellant's execution of the new lease agreement for an alternate location in appellee's building afforded the necessary consideration. See Soto v. Bridgers, 136 Ga. App. 196 ( 220 S.E.2d 748). "As a general rule, whether there is accord and satisfaction is a question for the jury. [Cit.] The cardinal rule of the summary judgment procedure is that the court can neither resolve the facts nor reconcile the issues, but only look to ascertain if there is a material issue of fact. [Cits.