From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 18, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1664 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1664 LKK JFM P.

January 18, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

"A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him or her as the respondent to the petition." Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994) (citing Rule 2(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254). Petitioner has named the Board of Prison Terms as respondent in this action. This individual is not the proper respondent in this action. Accordingly, the instant petition must be dismissed with leave to amend. See Stanley, 21 F.3d at 360.

Petitioner has filed two motions for appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, petitioner's motions will be denied without prejudice to their renewal at a later stage of the proceedings.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district;

3. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition within thirty days from the date of this order;

4. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court, must name the proper respondent, and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action and must bear the title "Amended Petition";

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus application; and

6. Petitioner's August 14, 2007 and August 28, 2007 motions for appointment of counsel are denied.


Summaries of

Soto v. Board of Prison Terms

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 18, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1664 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Soto v. Board of Prison Terms

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SOTO, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1664 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2008)