From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Aguero

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 13, 2024
3:22cv527 (M.D. Pa. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

3:22cv527

05-13-2024

CANDIDO SOTO, Plaintiff v. PABLO AGUERO, Defendant


Carlson Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Julia K. Munley Judge

Before the court for disposition is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 23, 2024. (Doc. 21). The R&R recommends dismissing this case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time for such filing has passed. Therefore, in deciding whether to adopt the R&R, the court must determine if a review of the record evidences plain error or manifest injustice. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) 1983 Advisory Committee Notes (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record to accept the recommendation”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Sullivan v. Cuyler, 723 F.2d 1077, 1085 (3d Cir. 1983).

After a careful review, the court finds neither a clear error on the face of the record nor a manifest injustice, and therefore, the R&R shall be adopted. It is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1) The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED;

2) The plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute; and

3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Soto v. Aguero

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 13, 2024
3:22cv527 (M.D. Pa. May. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Soto v. Aguero

Case Details

Full title:CANDIDO SOTO, Plaintiff v. PABLO AGUERO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 13, 2024

Citations

3:22cv527 (M.D. Pa. May. 13, 2024)