From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto-Henry v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 13, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

Motion No: M-5033

12-13-2016

Marisa Soto-Henry, Plaintiff-Respondent, CONFIDENTIAL v. Christopher Henry, Defendant-Appellant, Michael Pottinger, et al., Defendants.


An appeal having been taken from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about May 20, 2016, And defendant-appellant having moved for an enlargement of time to perfect the aforesaid appeal and to obtain a court ordered subpoena, duces tecum, and for other relief, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of enlarging the time to perfect the appeal to the March 2017 Term, with no further enlargements to be granted. The stay granted by order of this Court on July 21, 2016 (M-2802) is continued on condition that the appeal is perfected for said March 2017 Term. The motion is otherwise denied.

ENTERED: December 13, 2016

_____________________ CLERK

PRESENT: Hon. David Friedman, Justice Presiding, Dianne T. Renwick Paul G. Feinman Judith J. Gische Barbara R. Kapnick, Justices

M-5033

Index No. 102061/12


Summaries of

Soto-Henry v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 13, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Soto-Henry v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:Marisa Soto-Henry, Plaintiff-Respondent, CONFIDENTIAL v. Christopher…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 13, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 96022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)