From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sotelo v. Sotelo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Apr 26, 2017
No. 04-17-00019-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 26, 2017)

Opinion

No. 04-17-00019-CV

04-26-2017

Roy H. SOTELO III, Appellant v. Mercedes H. SOTELO, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014-03-29890-CV
The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief was due on March 27, 2017. When neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time were filed, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant failed to respond to our order. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Sotelo v. Sotelo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Apr 26, 2017
No. 04-17-00019-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Sotelo v. Sotelo

Case Details

Full title:Roy H. SOTELO III, Appellant v. Mercedes H. SOTELO, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

No. 04-17-00019-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 26, 2017)