From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorrow v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 21, 2021
Civil Action 2:20-CV-169 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:20-CV-169

07-21-2021

LOYD LANDON SORROW, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS JUDGE

On February 9, 2021, the Court entered final judgment in this action, dismissing it with prejudice. D.E. 34. On June 17, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment. D.E. 39. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's “‘Objection' and Motion for ‘Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law'” (D.E. 41). The Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are already contained in the Magistrate Judge's memoranda and recommendations (M&Rs) and the Court's adoption of the M&Rs. Plaintiff is not entitled to any additional findings or conclusions. Plaintiff further objects to the decision, rearguing the merits of his claims. His arguments are not timely and are not appropriate subjects for a further motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. The motion is DENIED.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sorrow v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 21, 2021
Civil Action 2:20-CV-169 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Sorrow v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LOYD LANDON SORROW, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:20-CV-169 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2021)