From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorrentino v. Paganica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 2005
18 A.D.3d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-07710.

May 31, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated July 15, 2004, which denied her motion for summary judgment.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In opposition to the defendant's prima facie demonstration that the sole proximate cause of the plaintiff's alleged injury was his own negligence in placing his fingers into the chute of the defendant's snow blower, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Amaya v. L'Hommedieu, 6 AD3d 638; see also Liriano v. Hobart Corp., 92 NY2d 232; Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308). Thus, the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted.


Summaries of

Sorrentino v. Paganica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 2005
18 A.D.3d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Sorrentino v. Paganica

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SORRENTINO, Respondent, v. ELVIRA PAGANICA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

Gorbatov v. Matfer Grp.

The expert evidence submitted in connection with the defendants' motions demonstrated, among other things,…

McGrath v. Oyster Bay Visiting Nurse Assn

A landowner has a duty to maintain his or her premises in a reasonably safe manner; however, there is no duty…