From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorrells v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 17, 2001
NO. 4:01-CV-0324-A (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2001)

Opinion

NO. 4:01-CV-0324-A

September 17, 2001


ORDER


Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Dennis Ray Sorrells is petitioner and Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, is respondent. This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 21, 2001, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation and ordered that the parties be granted until September 11, 2001, in which to file, and not merely place in the mail, written objections thereto. Copies of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation were sent to petitioner and respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested. Return receipts have been received by the Clerk and placed in the file. Such receipts reflect that copies were received on behalf of petitioner on August 22, 2001, and on behalf of respondent on August 24, 2001. Because timely objections have not been filed, further appeal is waived. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Therefore, the court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The court ORDERS that the petition be, and is hereby, dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Sorrells v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 17, 2001
NO. 4:01-CV-0324-A (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2001)
Case details for

Sorrells v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS RAY SORRELLS, Petitioner, v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 17, 2001

Citations

NO. 4:01-CV-0324-A (N.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2001)

Citing Cases

Nunnelley v. Stephens

Consequently, before seeking state habeas corpus relief pursuant to article 11.07, an inmate must typically…

Jackson v. Cockrell

Additionally, "as of January 1, 2000, inmates are now required to first pursue claims of denial of time…