From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorrell v. Dallas

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 25, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-1065-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2008)

Summary

accepting recommendation of Mag. J.

Summary of this case from Silver v. Perez

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-1065-G (BH).

August 25, 2008


ORDER


After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are ACCEPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sorrell v. Dallas

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 25, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-1065-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2008)

accepting recommendation of Mag. J.

Summary of this case from Silver v. Perez
Case details for

Sorrell v. Dallas

Case Details

Full title:ELLIS W. SORRELL, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS, TX BRIDGE SHELTER, Staff, Bldg. 2…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08-CV-1065-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Silver v. Perez

Federal courts, furthermore, lack personal jurisdiction over John Doe defendants. See Sorrell v. Dallas, TX…

Easterling v. U.S. Bank

Plaintiffs, even those proceeding pro se, have a "duty to provide information sufficient to identify the…