From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorokin v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02178-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02178-EFB (HC)

01-04-2023

YEVGENIY N. SOROKIN, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE, Respondent.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a county jail inmate without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. However, he has neither filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Sorokin v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 4, 2023
2:22-cv-02178-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Sorokin v. People

Case Details

Full title:YEVGENIY N. SOROKIN, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02178-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2023)