Summary
denying petition for certiorari review of an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a final judgment for removal of a tenant
Summary of this case from Percival v. CappsOpinion
No. 3D11–1129.
2012-03-7
The SORO COMPANY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner, v. Gregory T. JONES, Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the circuit court for Miami–Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, Sandy Karlan, and William Thomas, Judges. Jerry D. Haynes, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. Ruben E. Dorta, Hialeah, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the circuit court for Miami–Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, Sandy Karlan, and William Thomas, Judges.
Jerry D. Haynes, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. Ruben E. Dorta, Hialeah, for respondent.
Before WELLS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
WELLS, Chief Judge.
The Soro Company International Inc. appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a Final Judgment for Removal of a Tenant. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, seeFla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court must determine whether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).
Certiorari denied.