From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorgman v. Musick

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 27, 2015
NO. 01-15-00372-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 01-15-00372-CV

10-27-2015

LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant v. JASON MUSICK & STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL CITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellees


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Travis County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. C-1-CV-15-002112

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Lu Shannon Sorgman, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.


Summaries of

Sorgman v. Musick

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 27, 2015
NO. 01-15-00372-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Sorgman v. Musick

Case Details

Full title:LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant v. JASON MUSICK & STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Oct 27, 2015

Citations

NO. 01-15-00372-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2015)