From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2003
304 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2.

April 17, 2003.

Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about January 2, 2001, which granted defendants-respondents' respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Robert M. Marino, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James M. Lloyd, Patrick J. Yella, for defendants-respondents.

Before: NARDELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, ELLERIN, LERNER, JJ.


Although plaintiffs allege that the complained-of accident was attributable to a negligently designed parking lot, defendant Taylor's Supermarket, in support of its summary judgment motion, demonstrated that the parking lot in question was, at the time of the accident, in compliance with all applicable statutes, rules and regulations, and with the standards promulgated by the American Society for Testing and Materials for concrete barriers, and the conclusory responding affidavit of plaintiff's expert was insufficient to raise a triable issue as to negligence (see Detko v. McDonald's Rests., 198 A.D.2d 208).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2003
304 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Sorenson v. Taylor's Supermarket

Case Details

Full title:JESSICA SORENSON, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TAYLOR'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 438

Citing Cases

Ragusa v. Lincoln

Defendants submitted evidence showing that they obtained all of the requisite permits for the installation of…