Opinion
10 Civ. 4596 (JGK)
04-05-2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge;
The plaintiff moves for reconsideration of this Court's decision issued on the record at the hearing held on February 14, 2012, which granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss. The plaintiff has failed to show that there were any issues of fact or law that the Court overlooked. While the plaintiff disagrees with the Court's decision, that is not a basis for reconsideration. See, e.g., R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi So, 640 F. Supp. 2d 506, 512-13 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). Indeed, having reviewed the motion for reconsideration, there is nothing in the motion that suggests that the Court's decision was incorrect in any way.
The motion for reconsideration is therefore denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 44.
SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York
April 5, 2012
__________________
John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge