From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorce v. Great Oak Marina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued March 19, 2001

April 16, 2001

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), entered July 17, 2000, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

John L. Juliano, P.C., East Northport, N.Y., for appellants.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Frederick B. Simpson and Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff Vincent Sorce (hereinafter the plaintiff) stored his boat for the winter on property owned by the defendant Great Oak Marina (hereinafter the marina). The boat was stored on cement blocks under a row of hemlock trees. The plaintiff was injured when he went to the boat to retrieve some of his belongings. As he climbed onto the boat's swim platform, he pushed aside a heavy tree branch, which broke and caused him to fall.

The Supreme Court properly granted the marina's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The tree branches overhanging the plaintiff's boat did not constitute an inherently dangerous condition on the property (see, Plessias v. John Vincent Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 A.D.2d 423; Pepic v. Joco Realty, 216 A.D.2d 95; Pilato v. Diamond, 209 A.D.2d 393; see generally, Macey v. Truman, 70 N.Y.2d 918, amended 71 N.Y.2d 949; Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233). Furthermore, since the tree branch could be readily observed by the reasonable use of one's senses, the marina had no duty to warn the plaintiff of the condition (see, Doyle v. State of New York, 271 A.D.2d 394; Binensztok v. Marshall Stores, 228 A.D.2d 534; Ackermann v. Town of Fishkill, 201 A.D.2d 441).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sorce v. Great Oak Marina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sorce v. Great Oak Marina

Case Details

Full title:Vincent Sorce, et al., appellants, v. Great Oak Marina, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 505

Citing Cases

Pomianowski v. City of N.Y

We affirm. The City established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating…

Nardi v. Crowley Marine Associates, Inc.

Liability under common-law negligence will not attach when the allegedly dangerous condition complained of…