From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sorakrai v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 31, 1990
566 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-03548.

August 31, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Claire K. Luten, Judge.

James F. Manderscheid, St. Petersburg Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


It appears that this appeal has been taken directly from the denial of appellant's motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Accordingly, the appeal is subject to dismissal as premature. We note that the trial court, in accepting appellant's plea of nolo contendere, agreed to certify that this case involves a question of great importance. However, we believe that substantially the same question already has been addressed by this court in a prior proceeding. State v. Sorakrai, 543 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Appeal dismissed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sorakrai v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 31, 1990
566 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Sorakrai v. State

Case Details

Full title:SURAPO S. SORAKRAI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 31, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)