Opinion
October 3, 1945.
Present — Taylor, P.J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [See post, p. 1010.]
Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The orders deny defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 1945
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Summaries of
Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 1945
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for
Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:NICK SOPORITO, Respondent, v. HETZLER FOUNDRIES, INC., Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 3, 1945
Citations
269 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Citing Cases
Scardino v. Ring Optical Co.
The motion was properly denied. (See Soporito v. Hetzler Foundries, Inc., 269 App. Div. 962, affd. 295 N.Y.…