From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sonntag v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2012
3:10-cv-00603-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00603-RCJ-VPC

08-14-2012

JASON ERIC SONNTAG, Plaintiff, v. MILLER et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff prisoner sued Defendants in this Court, alleging several constitutional violations. The Court screened and dismissed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Five months later, Plaintiff filed the present motion to reconsider. The motion contains no argumentation why Plaintiff believes the Court erred but simply repeats and amplifies the allegations in the Complaint. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 9) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sonntag v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 14, 2012
3:10-cv-00603-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Sonntag v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JASON ERIC SONNTAG, Plaintiff, v. MILLER et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

3:10-cv-00603-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 14, 2012)