From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sonmez v. Sonmez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1986
121 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

July 3, 1986

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Elrich Eastman, J.).


Petitioner pro se commenced this proceeding on August 23, 1982 pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 to upwardly modify a prior order of the Family Court which directed respondent to pay $50 per week in child support. Petitioner claimed that her needs and the needs of the child had increased, and that the respondent had greater financial resources than he admitted, and she sought a modification to $150 per week. After protracted proceedings, the Hearing Officer recommended upward modification to $75 per week effective May 27, 1983 and Judge Eastman confirmed the report.

Since Family Court Act § 449 provides that an order of support be made effective as of the date of the filing of the petition, and in recognition of the lengthy delays in this proceeding not of petitioner's making, we modify the order to fix the award retroactive to August 23, 1982, the date of filing the petition.

We have examined the other points raised on this appeal, and on this record we find them without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Lynch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

Sonmez v. Sonmez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1986
121 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Sonmez v. Sonmez

Case Details

Full title:DYANNE O. SONMEZ, Appellant, v. KEMAL SONMEZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Ryan

§ 413[1][f][9]; Riemersma v. Riemersma, 84 A.D.3d at 1477, 922 N.Y.S.2d 616;Matter of Spoor v. Spoor, 276…

Rough v. Kandell

Moreover, we find that Special Term erred in striking from its prior order the provision making the increase…