From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sonic Automotive v. James

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 19, 2005
910 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 1D04-4724.

September 19, 2005.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Dan F. Turnbull, Judge.

Cindy R. Galen of Eraclides, Johns, Hall, Gelman, Eikner Johannessen, L.L.P., Sarasota, for Appellants.

Robert E. Keezel, Fort Myers, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe Cooley, Longwood, for Appellee.


Sonic Automotive and Royal Sunalliance, the employer and carrier, appeal a workers' compensation order awarding appellee claimant temporary indemnity benefits, which we affirm, as supported by competent, substantial evidence. We address, however, appellants' third point, urging that the judge of compensation claims erred in confronting the issue of the major contributing cause of claimant's need for medical care in that no claim for such benefit had been filed.

The language which appellants take issue with was not placed in the decretal portion of the order, but was instead located under the judge's findings, wherein it is recited: "There is no medical dispute from a pain management perspective that the aggravation of employee/claimant's pre-existing conditions caused by the industrial accidents is and remains the major contributing cause of the claimant's disability and need for continued medical treatment." We strike the words "and need for continued medical treatment" as unnecessary surplusage. As modified, the order is

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sonic Automotive v. James

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 19, 2005
910 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Sonic Automotive v. James

Case Details

Full title:SONIC AUTOMOTIVE and Royal Sunalliance, Appellants, v. Matthew J. JAMES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

910 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)