From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sondrup v. Pathfinder Indemnity Company LTD

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 19, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01662-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 19, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01662-WYD-BNB.

July 19, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before me on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. # 43, filed 6/11/2007] (the "Motion to Compel").

I held a hearing on the motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART; and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT as follows:

(1) GRANTED to require responses to Interrogatories No. 8 and 10;

(2) DENIED with respect to Production Requests No. 11 and 16; and

(3) DENIED AS MOOT in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall provide to the plaintiff a privilege log identifying all documents withheld on a claim of privilege.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall make supplemental discovery and otherwise comply with this order on or before August 1, 2007.


Summaries of

Sondrup v. Pathfinder Indemnity Company LTD

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 19, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01662-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Sondrup v. Pathfinder Indemnity Company LTD

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY SONDRUP, Plaintiff, v. PATHFINDER INDEMNITY COMPANY LTD., a…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01662-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 19, 2007)