From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sondesky v. Isr Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 17, 2014
No. 14-1077 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1077

07-17-2014

BARBIE SONDESKY and RONALD SONDESKY, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated employees, Plaintiffs, v. ISR GROUP, INC. and ALFRED LUMPKIN, Defendants


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AND STAYING CASE

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (D.E. 13) of the magistrate judge, filed June 18, 2014, recommending that the May 29, 2014 motion (D.E. 11) of the Defendant, Alfred Lumpkin, seeking to stay this action pending resolution of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Defendant, ISR Group, Inc., be granted. According to the Court's docket, no objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for such objections has now expired.

The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. No objections having been filed to the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Lumpkin's motion to stay proceedings is GRANTED. The parties are DIRECTED to notify the Court within thirty days following the resolution of Defendant's bankruptcy petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2014.

J. DANIEL BREEN

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sondesky v. Isr Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 17, 2014
No. 14-1077 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Sondesky v. Isr Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BARBIE SONDESKY and RONALD SONDESKY, on behalf of themselves and all other…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 17, 2014

Citations

No. 14-1077 (W.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2014)