Summary
discussing Section 634-24 and explaining that "this method of service is only proper when authorized by court order"
Summary of this case from Isaac v. DanielsOpinion
Civ. No. 16-00558 JMS-KJM
01-27-2017
MARIA D. SOMMERS, Plaintiff, v. KAY OKAMOTO; ROY OKAMOTO; OKAMOTO REALTY, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Findings and Recommendation having been filed on January 5, 2017, and served concurrently upon those counsel of record who are registered participants of CM/ECF, and served on January 6, 2017, by First Class Mail to the address of record for Maria D. Sommers, and no objections having been filed by any party,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "(1) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANTS KAY OKAMOTO, ROY OKAMOTO, AND OKAMOTO REALTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND (2) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF MARIA D. SOMMERS'S MOTION TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT," ECF No. 20, the Findings and Recommendations are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court with the following modification. On January 26, 2017, counsel for Defendants accepted service on behalf of all Defendants as of that date. See ECF No. 25. Accordingly, the court declines to adopt the recommendation that this court "provide Plaintiff with an additional 30 days from the issuance of its order to properly serve Defendants," as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 27, 2017.
/s/ J. Michael Seabright
J. Michael Seabright
Chief United States District Judge