From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solutions v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 18, 2008
247 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90389.

March 18, 2008.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 07-10321 R-A.

Robert Thomeczek, Thomeczek Law Firm, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Marilyn Green, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Appliance Solutions appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision finding Rose Crawford was not disqualified for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Solutions v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 18, 2008
247 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Solutions v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, Employer/Appellant, v. Rose CRAWFORD…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 18, 2008

Citations

247 S.W.3d 589 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)