From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soltesz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1981
394 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. TT-345.

March 5, 1981.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hamilton County; Royce Agner, Judge.

Donald G. Nichols of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Sulik Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant's attack on the constitutionality of Section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1979), the so-called "drug-trafficking" law on Fifth Amendment grounds raises issues already decided adversely to his position by this court in Stehling v. State, 391 So.2d 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The decision of the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981), holding the statute (specifically subsections (1) and (3)) constitutional, disposes of the Fifth Amendment argument as well as all other contentions made by appellant concerning the validity of these enactments.

Appellant's second point on appeal (validity of search warrant issued pursuant to affidavit based on officers detection of the odor of marijuana) is affirmed on authority of Mahla v. State, 383 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and State v. Farrugia, 393 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Soltesz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1981
394 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Soltesz v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS P. SOLTESZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 5, 1981

Citations

394 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)