From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solosko v. Paxton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 1956
383 Pa. 419 (Pa. 1956)

Opinion

October 10, 1955.

January 3, 1956.

Defamation — Slander — Slander per se — Calling plaintiff a Communist — Act of December 21, 1951, P. L. 1712.

In this action in trespass for slander in which it appeared that on three separate occasions in December 1952 and January 1953 the defendant in referring to the plaintiff said "He is a Communist", it was Held that since the enactment of the Act of December 21, 1951, P. L. 1712, stating to a third person that the plaintiff is a Communist is slander per se.

Argued October 10, 1955. Before STERN, C. J., STEARNE, JONES, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.

Appeal, No. 42, March T., 1955, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Somerset County, C. D. 1953, No. 397, in case of Alexander Solosko v. George R. Paxton. Judgment affirmed.

Same case in court below: 4 Pa. D. C.2d 240.

Trespass for slander. Before LANSBERRY, P. J.

Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $10,000.; verdict remitted to $3500. and judgment entered thereon. Defendant appealed.

W. L. Kimmel, with him Leland W. Walker and Walker Kimmel, for appellant. Paul E. C. Fike, with him Joseph N. Cascio and Fike Cascio, for appellee.


The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge LANSBERRY reported at 4 Pa. D. C.2d 240.


Summaries of

Solosko v. Paxton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 1956
383 Pa. 419 (Pa. 1956)
Case details for

Solosko v. Paxton

Case Details

Full title:Solosko v. Paxton, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 1956

Citations

383 Pa. 419 (Pa. 1956)
119 A.2d 230

Citing Cases

Walker v. Grand Cent. Sanitation, Inc.

Although the statute does not expressly provide the answer, it presumably does not overrule the long line of…

Synygy, Inc. v. Scott-Levin, Inc.

See also Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U.S. 29, 37, 91 S.Ct. 1811, 29 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971)…